Uncategorized

Read Our COVID-19 Research And News


0

Read our COVID-19 research and news.

Eric A. Ortlund1,*,
Jamie T. Bridgham2,*,
Matthew R. Redinbo1,
Joseph W. Thornton2,†
1 Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

2 Center for Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.

↵† To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: joetatuoregon.edu
– ↵* These authors contributed equally to this work.

See allHide authors and affiliations

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site

Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
eLetters
PDF

You are currently viewing the abstract.

Log in to view the full text

via AAAS login

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Become an AAAS Member
Activate your Account
Purchase Access to Other Journals in the Science Family
Account Help

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Existing users log in.

Become a AAAS member
Account help

Log in through your institution

More options

Purchase digital access to this article

Download and print this article for your personal scholarly, research, and educational use.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

Abstract

The structural mechanisms by which proteins have evolved new functions are known only indirectly. We report x-ray crystal structures of a resurrected ancestral protein-the ∼450 million-year-old precursor of vertebrate glucocorticoid (GR) and mineralocorticoid (MR) receptors. Using structural, phylogenetic, and functional analysis, we identify the specific set of historical mutations that recapitulate the evolution of GR’s hormone specificity from an MR-like ancestor. These substitutions repositioned crucial residues to create new receptor-ligand and intraprotein contacts. Strong epistatic interactions occur because one substitution changes the conformational position of another site. “Permissive” mutations-substitutions of no immediate consequence, which stabilize specific elements of the protein and allow it to tolerate subsequent function-switching changes-played a major role in determining GR’s evolutionary trajectory.

Science

Vol 317, Issue 5844
14 September 2007

Article Tools

Email
Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Science.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Your Email
Your Name
Send To
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
You are going to email the following Crystal Structure of an Ancient Protein: Evolution by Conformational Epistasis
Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Science
Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Science web site.
Your Personal Message

CAPTCHAThis question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Send Message

Download Powerpoint

Print

Alerts
Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Log In with your AAAS ID

Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email
Log in

Citation tools
Crystal Structure of an Ancient Protein: Evolution by Conformational Epistasis

By Eric A. Ortlund, Jamie T. Bridgham, Matthew R. Redinbo, Joseph W. Thornton

Science14 Sep 2007 : 1544-1548

Citation Manager Formats

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

Crystal Structure of an Ancient Protein: Evolution by Conformational Epistasis

By Eric A. Ortlund, Jamie T. Bridgham, Matthew R. Redinbo, Joseph W.


Like it? Share with your friends!

0
admin